Friday, February 1, 2013

SALAM Illinois - Support and Legal Advocacy for Muslim Prisoners in Illinois

SALAM Illinois is an outgrowth of Project SALAM - Support and Legal Advocacy for Muslims. Project SALAM focuses on US post-9/11 prosecutions of Muslims, generally depicted as "pre-emptive," in which the prosecution is characterized by profiling, the use of “agent provocateurs”/ “informants", coercion, security theater, and other abusive practices.

SALAM Illinois has been founded to focus on providing support and legal advocacy for prisoners who fall under the Project SALAM description (above) and are being held in the U.S. federal penitentiaries (often in Communication Management Units (CMUs)) at Marion, IL, and Terre Haute, IN. See, for instance, A Case in Point: The Holy Land Foundation Case.

The goals of SALAM Illinois in its initial phase are:
* to break the silence surrounding the dozens of targeted Muslim men who have ended up being held in the federal prisons at Marion, IL, and Terre Haute, IN, including in the the Communication Management Units (CMUs)

* to develop a network of supporting organizations to support SALAM Illinois

* to encourage concerned individuals to learn about individual prisoners supported by SALAM Illinois, and to communicate with those prisoners directly

* to cooperate in holding public education events to increase public awareness of the specific cases of the aforementioned Marion, IL, and Terre Haute, IN, inmates, specifically, and the ongoing persecution of Muslim men in the United States, in general

* to lay the foundation for an expanded program of support and legal advocacy for aforementioned Marion, IL, and Terre Haute, IN, inmates

Tuesday, January 15, 2013

What is "Preemptive Prosecution" and Why Is It Abusive?

Preemptive prosecution (also called preventive, predatory, proactive, pretextual, or manufactured prosecution) is a law enforcement strategy adopted after 9/11 to target for prosecution individuals or organizations whose beliefs, ideology, or religious affiliations raise security concerns for the government.

WHAT IS PREEMPTIVE PROSECUTION?

Preemptive prosecution uses actual criminal charges as pretexts, manufactured by the government to incarcerate the targets for their beliefs. These pretexts include:
  1. Using "material support for terrorism" laws to criminalize activities that are not otherwise considered criminal, such as free speech, free association, charity, and social hospitality.

  2. Using conspiracy laws to treat friendships and organizations as criminal conspiracies, and their members as guilty by association, even when most members of the group have not been involved in criminal activity and may not even be aware of it.

  3. Entrapping targets in criminal plots manufactured and controlled by the government.

  4. Using "technical" crimes, which otherwise would not have been prosecuted, to target individuals for their ideology (for example, making a minor error on an immigration form, which is technically a crime). In this approach, the FBI combs through every detail of one's life, looking for crimes which otherwise would not have been discovered.
THE ABUSIVE NATURE OF PREEMPTIVE PROSECUTION

Journalist Chris Hedges has written that “the concept of pre-emptive prosecution mocks domestic law as egregiously as pre-emptive war mocks the foundations of international law.”

Strategies employed in a preemptive prosecution often include government use of:
  • stings
  • material support charges
  • conspiracy charges (whereby all associates are equally culpable, even if they do not know of the existence of a plan)
  • old charges as pretext
  • frame-ups
  • tortured confessions
  • false statements/perjury charges
  • contempt charges
  • immigration-related charges
  • use of solitary confinement pre-trial to coerce a guilty plea and post-trial to coerce additional information on associates
Targeted activities often include:
  • participation in a fictional sting
  • First Amendment-protected activities
  • association with other targeted individuals
  • supposed mishandling or divulging classified information
  • joining a national liberation movement that the government disagrees with
  • charity financing
  • attendance at a training camp
You can read more about how these abusive practices have been used in the pages throughout this site which describe individual cases.

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Support for Muslim Prisoners in MARION

The following prisoners are being held at the U.S. penitentiary at Marion, IL.

You can write to any of them with this address format:
PRISONER
Number
U.S. Penitentiary
P.O. Box 1000
Marion IL, 62959
Where a coordinator is indicated, you may wish to be in touch with the outreach coordinator to learn about the prisoner's preferences with respect to mail.

In general, letters should not refer to the prisoner's cases, other prisoners, and avoid politically sensitive topics. (See SALAM Illinois Guidelines for Writing to Prisoners.)

Please obtain the prisoner's permission to share the contents of their letters, if you will be making them available to SALAM Illinois. (You might include in your letter, "If you send me a letter, please indicate if it is okay to share the letter with other members of the SALAM Illinois group, and/or to publish the letter on the SALAM Illinois website.")


PRISONER Number Case SALAM Illinois
Outreach Coordinator
Clement Rodney Hampton-El 34854-054 NYC Landmarks TBA
El Sayyid Nosair 35074-054 NYC Landmarks TBA
Fares Khallafalla 34856-054 NYC Landmarks TBA
Ghassan Elashi 29687-177 Holy Land Foundation Joe Scarry
Ibrahim A. Elgabrowny 28054-054 NYC Landmarks TBA
Jeffrey Leon Battle 96638-011 Portland 7 Joe Scarry
Kifah Wael Jayyousi 39551-039 Jose Padilla Reem Jayyousi
Mohammad Zaki Amawi 30547-160 Toledo Terror Plot TBA
Mohamad Ibrahim Shnewer 61283-066 Fort Dix TBA
Mohammed Saleh 34853-054 NYC Landmarks TBA
Viktor Bout 91641-054 TBA
Zachary Adam Chesser 76715-083 TBA

[NOTE: Table updated November 21, 2012]

Support for Muslim Prisoners in TERRE HAUTE

The following prisoners are being held at the U.S. penitentiary at Terre Haute, IN.

You can write to any of them with this address format:
PRISONER
Number
TERRE HAUTE FCI
P.O. BOX 33
Terre Haute, IN 47808
Where a coordinator is indicated, you may wish to be in touch with the outreach coordinator to learn about the prisoner's preferences with respect to mail.

In general, letters should not refer to the prisoner's cases, other prisoners, and avoid politically sensitive topics. (See SALAM Illinois Guidelines for Writing to Prisoners.)

Please obtain the prisoner's permission to share the contents of their letters, if you will be making them available to SALAM Illinois. (You might include in your letter, "If you send me a letter, please indicate if it is okay to share the letter with other members of the SALAM Illinois group, and/or to publish the letter on the SALAM Illinois website.")


PRISONER Number Case SALAM Illinois
Outreach Coordinator
Antonio Martinez 52856-037 TBA
Artur Tchibassa 25340-069 TBA
Christopher Paul 67216-061 TBA
Ehsanul Islam Sadequee 15240-006 Toronto 18 (related) Sharmin Sadequee
Eljvir Duka 61282-066 Fort Dix Joe Scarry
Farooque Ahmed 77315-083 TBA
Hosam Maher Husein Smadi 39482-177 TBA
Imran Mandhai 56175-004 South Florida
Jihad Mission
TBA
John Walker Lindh 45426-083 TBA
Kevin James 29214-112 CA Prison Plot TBA
Levar Haney Washington 29205-112 TBA
Marwan Othman El-Hindi 43530-060 TBA
Mohamed Rashed 22178-016 TBA
Mohammad El-Mezain TBA Holy Land Foundation TBA
Mokhtar Haouari 44949-054 TBA
Monzer Al Kassar 61111-054 TBA
Mufid Abdel Abdulqader 32590-177 Holy Land Foundation TBA
Russell Defreitas 64347-053 JFK Plot TBA
Shukri Abu-Baker 32589-177 Holy Land Foundation TBA
Tarek Mehanna 05315-748 TBA
Uzair Paracha 54896-054 TBA

[NOTE: Table updated December 8, 2012]

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

SALAM Illinois Outreach Coordinators

SALAM Illinois "outreach coordinators" are people who write regularly to a given prisoner, and who are in a position to accept and respond to queries from others who wish to correspond with that prisoner.

Contact Joe Scarry, the general coordinator for SALAM Illinois, at jtscarry@yahoo.com if you or your organization wants to be an outreach coordinator for a prisoner.

Outreach Coordinators for individual prisoners are introduced below.

Reem Jayyousi is a student at Wayne State University with a major in Psychology and a minor in Sociology. She is a twenty-one year old Arab American, who was born in California and has lived in America for most of her life. Her father is Palestinian and her mother is Egyptian. She is the daughter of Kifah Jayyousi, a political prisoner who is currently being held in one of America’s “little Gitmo’s”. She is one of Kifah’s five children, together with her two sisters (ages fifteen and sixteen) and twin brothers (age twenty-six).   Coordinator for: Kifah Jayyousi.

Joe Scarry is an IT consultant and antiwar activist based in Chicago. He is a member of St. Luke's Lutheran Church of Logan Square, and a participant in Chicago World Can't Wait, Midwest Antiwar Mobilization, and local other activist groups. He is currently working to spur the development of a nationwide network of grassroots anti-drones group. His blog is Scarry Thoughts. Email: jtscarry@yahoo.com  Coordinator for: Ghassan Elashi, Jeffrey Leon Battle, Eljvir Duka.

Joe Scarry is also the general coordinator for SALAM Illinois. Contact him at jtscarry@yahoo.com if you or your organization wants to be a supporter of SALAM Illinois.

SALAM Illinois - Guidelines for Writing to Prisoners

The following important guidelines are provided for letters written to prisoners:
  • do not discuss the prisoner's case
  • do not refer to other prisoners
  • do not write about politically sensitive topics
Here are some additional suggestions:
  • Write your letters in English and preferably by hand.
  • Keep it short. A one paragraph to one-page letter of moral support is enough.
  • If you want a reply or be pen pal with a prisoner, write your address inside the letter.
  • Do NOT discuss his/her legal case, politics, the legal system or other issues that may be hurtful or emotionally distressing for the prisoner.
  • Do NOT send other items, such as money, stamps, envelopes or paperclips and do NOT tape the envelope shut.
  • Write your letter from the heart.
  • You can send artworks, post cards, greetings cards etc as well.
For additional guidance and suggestions, please be in touch with the SALAM Illinois Outreach Coordinator indicated for the prisoner.

Monday, November 19, 2012

What is a CMU?

Many of the Muslim prisoners who have been preemptively prosecuted are held in "Communication Management Units (CMUs)." There are two CMUs in the United States: at Marion, IL, and Terre Haute, IN.

What is a CMU?

"CMUs, alone out of all general population units within the federal system, impose a categorical ban on any physical contact with visiting friends and family, including babies, infants, and minor children. To further social isolation, the BOP has placed severe restrictions on CMU prisoners’ access to phone calls and prison programming." (See: CCR Complaint - Aref v. BOP, section 2)

In other words, a "Communication Management Unit (CMU)" is modified form of solitary confinement characterized by:
  • no physical contact with family and friends;
  • extremely limited opportunity for non-contact visitation and other communication;
  • denial of programming; and
  • complete segregation from the rest of the prison population.
Each of these characteristics of the CMU is described below.

No physical contact with family and friends

"As a general matter, the BOP encourages contact visitation by family, friends, and community groups to maintain the morale of the inmate and to aid rehabilitation. ... The BOP has established procedures to prevent the passage of contraband and to ensure the security and good order of the institution. In that context, the BOP permits limited physical contact, such as handshaking, embracing, and kissing, between an inmate and a visitor, unless there is clear and convincing evidence that such contact would jeopardize the safety or security of the institution. The CMU ban on contact visits directly contradicts this explicit BOP policy. ... prolonged and indefinite ban on physical contact is extremely deleterious to Plaintiffs’ emotional and mental health and rehabilitation, and to maintenance of family integrity." (See: CCR Complaint - Aref v. BOP, section 37 ff. )

Extremely limited opportunity for non-contact visitation and other communication

(a) Limitations on non-contact visits

"As of January 3, 2010, CMU prisoners are now allowed eight hours of visiting time per month. No single visit can be scheduled for a period longer than four hours. Visits are permitted Sunday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. No visiting is allowed on Saturdays." This is distinctly more limited than visitation for prisoners in the general population. (See: CCR Complaint - Aref v. BOP, section 57 )

(b) Limitations on telephone calls

Generally, "BOP prisoners in general population are allowed 300 minutes of outgoing telephone calls per month. ... CMU prisoners are limited to 120 minutes of telephone calls a month. In addition: "CMU prisoners may only make a call if they sign up and designate the call recipient and the exact timing of the call one week in advance. If the recipient does not pick up the phone, or the call is cut off for some reason, CMU prisoners may not try the number again, nor are they allowed to call someone else instead." (See: CCR Complaint - Aref v. BOP, section 63 ff )

Denial of programming

BOP regulations provide for Release Preparation Program (“RPP”), and such programming is a mandatory requirement for prisoners within 30 months of release. There is a complete lack of such programming at the CMUs. (See: CCR Complaint - Aref v. BOP, section 71 )

Complete segregation from the rest of the prison population

"Although described as a 'general population housing unit,' prisoners in the CMU are segregated from other prisoners at both FCI Terre Haute and USP Marion and not allowed to have contact with non-CMU prisoners. The units are known and referred to throughout both prisons (and the BOP as a whole) as 'terrorist units.'" (See: CCR Complaint - Aref v. BOP, section 69 )


NOTE 1 re: solitary confinement equals torture: It is now widely recognized that CMUs and other forms of solitary confinement, because they constitute forms of severe sensory deprivation, are a form of torture. Sensory deprivation as a form of punishment (i.e. solitary confinement) is eschewed by most countries, and is now the subject of an abolition campaign in the United States. (See: New Amnesty International Report Exposes Severe, Inhumane Solitary Confinement Conditions for 3,000 California Prisoners)

NOTE 2 re: lack of due process in solitary confinement: Solitary confinement, including CMUs, constitute a penal-system-beyond-the-law, i.e. prisoners are subject to this treatment at the discretion of prison management, without procedural protections. FURTHERMORE, CMU assignment is at the discretion of managers at a level above site management; i.e. wardens, themselves, at Marion and Terre Haute have minimal opportunity for input and no decision authority. Duration of confinement in CMUs are of indefinite duration. (See CCR Complaint - Aref v. BOP, throughout )

NOTE 3: re: stigma of CMU solitary confinement: Pretexts for solitary confinement treatment generally fall into two categories: infractions (something the prisoner is accused of having done while in prison) or profiling (i.e. who the prisoner is). The CMU designation of Muslim prisoners has not been related to any legitimate penological purpose or substantiated information. Instead, their designation was based on their religion and/or perceived political beliefs, or in retaliation for other protected First Amendment activity. (See CCR Complaint - Aref v. BOP, section 69 )


For additional information, see: CCR Complaint - Aref v. BOP